<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>remove the labels - Gadgets and Life &#187; Cancer Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.removethelabels.com/category/cancer-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.removethelabels.com</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Graphics, VoIP, Video Games, Deals, Rumors, Rants, Reviews and such.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:31:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T Tries and Fails to Justify 3G Cap-Eating Microcell</title>
		<link>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/06/21/att-tries-and-fails-to-justify-3g-cap-eating-microcell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/06/21/att-tries-and-fails-to-justify-3g-cap-eating-microcell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[broadbandreports.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T femtocell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[femtocell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to screw over your customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metered billing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microcell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screw your customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unlimited data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.removethelabels.com/?p=27760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#038;T Tries and Fails to Justify 3G Cap-Eating Microcell - Should it count against the cap when no tower or backhaul's involved?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.removethelabels.com/images/att_microcell.jpg" width="550" border="0" /></p>
<p>It was <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATT-Microcell-3G-Use-Will-Count-Against-Your-Cap-108935" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATT-Microcell-3G-Use-Will-Count-Against-Your-Cap-108935?referer=');">noted how</a> AT&#038;T&#8217;s Microcell femtocell service was already a dubious value proposition given the device, intended to improve in-home cell coverage by routing voice and data calls over broadband, involves users paying AT&#038;T to help ease congestion on local towers. Not only does routing calls over your broadband service result in you eating your minutes, but it also now appears that using 3G at home eats away at your caps.</p>
<p><span id="more-27760"></span></p>
<p>That&#8217;s absurd, given that both voice and 3G over the device uses the user&#8217;s bandwidth &#8211; and not precious backhaul resources. </p>
<p>AT&#038;T&#8217;s been making the rounds trying to give an explanation for why they made the decision to make their Microcell service an even worse value, but the explanations so far aren&#8217;t making sense. </p>
<p>&#8220;3G MicroCell is primarily intended to enhance the voice call quality experience in your home,&#8221; AT&#038;T&#8217;s Seth Bloom tells us. &#8220;While it can carry mobile data traffic, that&#8217;s not the primary solution it provides,&#8221; he says. &#8220;Wi-Fi is the optimal solution for home mobile data use. We encourage people to take advantage of Wi-Fi capabilities &#8211; that&#8217;s why all of our smartphones include Wi-Fi radios, and usage on Wi-Fi doesn&#8217;t count against your mobile data usage bucket.&#8221; </p>
<p>Customers will probably decide to use their Wi-Fi connection when in the home. That still doesn&#8217;t explain why AT&#038;T lets the service eat 3G bandwidth caps should they use 3G. In that case, the traffic&#8217;s being routed over the exact same broadband connection as Wi-Fi. Whether users <b>should</b> use 3G over the Microcell in the home when Wi-Fi&#8217;s available isn&#8217;t the point. The service still shouldn&#8217;t be eating your wireless caps just like femtocells shouldn&#8217;t eat your voice minutes. </p>
<p>Bloom goes on to insist that the Microcell &#8220;uses our core wireless network just like a call placed while driving down the highway uses the core wireless network.&#8221; &#8220;The only difference is how that data or call gets there via a MicroCell connected to a wired broadband connection instead of a cell tower.&#8221; </p>
<p>Again though, you&#8217;re not using AT&#038;T&#8217;s tower or their backhaul, you&#8217;re using your own already-paid-for bandwidth. AT&#038;T&#8217;s entire justification for their new low caps and overages is backhaul and tower congestion (though even that&#8217;s <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Verizon-Wireless-To-Follow-ATT-Kill-Unlimited-Wireless-Data-108957" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/Verizon-Wireless-To-Follow-ATT-Kill-Unlimited-Wireless-Data-108957?referer=');">dubious</a> &#8211; simple profit is the more likely motivation) &#8211; and congestion&#8217;s not an issue here. Sure, there&#8217;s costs involved, but they&#8217;re minor compared to the costs of traditional wireless connectivity.  </p>
<p>Consider these are users shelling out for a home broadband connection, a wireless 3G and data connection, possibly an added landline connection, the upfront cost of hardware <strong>and</strong> an additional $20 if they want unlimited voice that doesn&#8217;t eat away at their minutes. Just how much are we expecting the average consumer to pay per month for simple, regular-use voice and data connectivity? </p>
<p>Either AT&#038;T&#8217;s gunning to make an additional few million annually in revenue off of those incapable of differentiating between 3G and Wi-Fi, or they&#8217;re incapable of getting the Wi-Fi/3G femtocell billing straightened out and don&#8217;t want to admit it. </p>
<p>Some might think this is all rather nerdy semantics, but these are important questions when exploring how carriers seem to be sucking all the value out of the femtocell with absurd pricing decisions and other penalties &#8211; especially when the femtocell helps the carrier more than it does you.
</p>
<p><a href=http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATT-Tries-Fails-To-Justify-3G-CapEating-Microcell-108967 onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATT-Tries-Fails-To-Justify-3G-CapEating-Microcell-108967?referer=');">Link to the original article&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/06/21/att-tries-and-fails-to-justify-3g-cap-eating-microcell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sennheiser goes pink for Breast Cancer Research</title>
		<link>http://www.removethelabels.com/2007/12/20/sennheiser-goes-pink-for-breast-cancer-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.removethelabels.com/2007/12/20/sennheiser-goes-pink-for-breast-cancer-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio_specialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast_cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copy_and_paste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ear_canal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic_corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming_device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grassroots_network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information_visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[komen_for_the_cure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msrp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music_enthusiasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music_lovers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable_music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regional_affiliates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound_quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[susan_g_komen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[susan_g_komen_for_the_cure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.removethelabels.com/?p=12193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though the color just doesn&#8217;t do me any justice, I thought that I&#8217;d share some cool headphone news and an Amazon and TigerDirect exclusive for a very good cause&#8230; the copy and paste is below: Music enthusiasts can now enjoy renowned sound quality while also supporting an important cause close to many hearts: through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.removethelabels.com/images/cx300_pink.jpg" alt="Sennheiser CX-300 Pink Headphones for Breast Cancer Research"/></p>
<p>Even though the color just doesn&#8217;t do me any justice, I thought that I&#8217;d share some cool headphone news and an <a href="http://www.amazon.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.amazon.com?referer=');">Amazon</a> and <a href="http://www.tigerdirect.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tigerdirect.com?referer=');">TigerDirect</a> exclusive for a <strong>very good cause</strong>&#8230; the copy and paste is below:</p>
<blockquote><p>Music enthusiasts can now enjoy renowned sound quality while also supporting an important cause close to many hearts: through the end of May 2008, audio specialist Sennheiser Electronic Corporation is offering a bubblegum-pink version of the best-selling CX 300 ear-canal headphone via select retailers to support Susan G. Komen for the Cure.  </p>
<p>$8.99, or 10%, of the MSRP for each limited-edition CX 300-Pink—the vibrant variant of Sennheiser’s popular CX 300 ear-canal headphones—will be donated directly to Susan G. Komen for the Cure.  The organization strives to cure breast cancer at every stage and is made up of both survivors and activists.</p>
<p>Like the CX 300, the new CX 300-Pink seals off ambient noise with comfortable ear adapters, which come in three different sizes for a perfect seal. The powerful bass-driven headphones are a must for music lovers and are an ideal complement for virtually any portable music and gaming device.</p>
<p>The CX 300-Pink is available now exclusively at <a target="_blank" href="http://Amazon.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/Amazon.com?referer=');"><span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1198484108_0">Amazon.com</span></a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://TigerDirect.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/TigerDirect.com?referer=');"><span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1198484108_1">TigerDirect.com</span></a> with an MSRP of $89.95.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And more about Susan G. Komen:</p>
<blockquote><p>About Susan G. Komen for the Cure<br />
The organization has regional affiliates in 125 cities and communities and is the world’s largest and most progressive grassroots network of its kind. For more information, visit the <a href="http://www.komen.org/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.komen.org/?referer=');">Susan G. Komen website</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.removethelabels.com/2007/12/20/sennheiser-goes-pink-for-breast-cancer-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/26 queries in 0.383 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 504/546 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.removethelabels.com @ 2012-02-14 07:48:24 -->
