<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>remove the labels - Gadgets and Life &#187; amd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.removethelabels.com/tag/amd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.removethelabels.com</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Graphics, VoIP, Video Games, Deals, Rumors, Rants, Reviews and such.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:31:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Acer&#8217;s netbook Ferrari One based on AMD Congo platform</title>
		<link>http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/11/21/acers-netbook-ferrari-one-based-on-amd-congo-platform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/11/21/acers-netbook-ferrari-one-based-on-amd-congo-platform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aving.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acer Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD Athlon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD Athlon 64]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferrari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferrari One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxymoron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Win 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.removethelabels.com/?p=25327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adopting a 11.6-inch CrystalBrite LED-backlit LCD monitor at 16:9 aspect ratio, the Ferrari One is powered by AMD Athlon 64x2 L310 Dual Core processor, 2GB DDR2 800MHz memory, M780G chipset, ATi Radeon HD 3200 graphics, 320GB HDD and Windows 7 OS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://aving.net/atc/read.asp?c_num=140321&amp;Branch_ID=usa" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/aving.net/atc/read.asp?c_num=140321_amp_Branch_ID=usa&amp;referer=');"><img src="http://image2.aving.net/2009/11/20/sm42520091120191906370.JPG" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Acer Korea [ <a href="http://www.acer.co.kr" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.acer.co.kr?referer=');">site here</a> ] has launched its new netbook &#8216;Ferrari One&#8217; based on AMD&#8217;s second generation ultra-thin platform, Congo.</p>
<p>Adopting a 11.6-inch CrystalBrite LED-backlit LCD monitor at 16:9 aspect ratio, the Ferrari One is powered by AMD Athlon 64&#215;2 L310 Dual Core processor, 2GB DDR2 800MHz memory, M780G chipset, ATi Radeon HD 3200 graphics, 320GB HDD and Windows 7 OS.</p>
<p>It comes with a Ferrari inspired design now available in the Korea.  Sorta a oxymoron though&#8230; netbook and Ferrari.  One is fast, the other&#8230; you get it.</p>
<p><a href=http://aving.net/atc/read.asp?c_num=140321&amp;Branch_ID=usa onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/aving.net/atc/read.asp?c_num=140321_amp_Branch_ID=usa&amp;referer=');">Link to the original article&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/11/21/acers-netbook-ferrari-one-based-on-amd-congo-platform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Athlon II X4 620 Processor Review &#8211; Quad-Core for Mainstream</title>
		<link>http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/09/16/amd-athlon-ii-x4-620-processor-review-quad-core-for-mainstream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/09/16/amd-athlon-ii-x4-620-processor-review-quad-core-for-mainstream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd mainstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd_athlon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd_phenom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlon x4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlon_2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlon_II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlon_II_620]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlon_quad_core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlon_x4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheap_cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu_review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinction. quad core cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad_core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.removethelabels.com/?p=24522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The good guys over at Tweaktown have reviewed the Athlon II X4 620 processor, a quad-core cpu for the masses.  It's not as hardcore as the AMD Phenom or Intel Quad Cores... but it's a quad core cpu for under $100 bucks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.removethelabels.com/images/amd_athlon_II_x4_620.jpg" alt="AMD Athlon II X4 620 Processor Review - Quad Core for Mainstream" /></p>
<p>The good guys over at Tweaktown have reviewed the Athlon II X4 620 processor, a quad-core cpu for the masses.  It&#8217;s not as hardcore as the AMD Phenom or Intel Quad Cores&#8230; but it&#8217;s a quad core cpu for under $100 bucks.</p>
<blockquote><p>AMD&#8217;s own marketing strategy for Phenom II is for high-end market, and it leaves a gap for the mainstream segment, but not anymore we see.</p>
<p>Today AMD has its newest addition to the K10 family out using the Athlon naming, which gave them such a good hit all those years ago. Introducing the first quad-core mainstream CPU from AMD, which is dubbed the Athlon II X4.</p>
<p>(<strong>Caches</strong>) This is where Athlon II makes its distinction from the Phenom II line. Athlon II has had a cache cut done in order to save money on production as well as to reduce its overall performance.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the entire [ <a href="http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/2922/amd_athlon_ii_x4_620_processor_review_quad_core_for_mainstream/index.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tweaktown.com/reviews/2922/amd_athlon_ii_x4_620_processor_review_quad_core_for_mainstream/index.html?referer=');">article</a> ] over at <a href="http://www.tweaktown.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tweaktown.com?referer=');">Tweaktown</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/09/16/amd-athlon-ii-x4-620-processor-review-quad-core-for-mainstream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VIA quits motherboard chipset business</title>
		<link>http://www.removethelabels.com/2008/08/11/via-quits-motherboard-chipset-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.removethelabels.com/2008/08/11/via-quits-motherboard-chipset-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaintech_motherboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chipsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chipset_makers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate_marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enthusiasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherboard_business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[original_article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm_of_your_hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pico_itx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third_parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video_memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x86]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x86_processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.removethelabels.com/?p=20377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After seeing the VIA Nano versus Intel Atom video, where the VIA Nano basically destroys an Intel Atom, albeit at a slightly higher wattage rating&#8230; you&#8217;d think that things at VIA were going better than great. They even have the VIA Nano, which looks to be a killer low-watt CPU, they have the Pico-ITX platform [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After seeing the <a href="http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=3MklPBVPSp0" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/ca.youtube.com/watch?v=3MklPBVPSp0&amp;referer=');">VIA Nano versus Intel Atom video</a>, where the VIA Nano basically destroys an Intel Atom, albeit at a slightly higher wattage rating&#8230; you&#8217;d think that things at VIA were going better than great.  </p>
<p>They even have the VIA Nano, which looks to be a killer low-watt CPU, they have the <a href="http://www.removethelabels.com/2008/06/28/via-pico-itx-goes-low-profile-integrates-power-supply/">Pico-ITX platform</a> which can essentially put an x86 based in the palm of your hand.</p>
<p>However, it seems like VIA is exiting the motherboard business to concentrate on building better processors:</p>
<blockquote><p>Previously one of the best chipset makers for enthusiasts looking for high performance on a budget, VIA has told Custom PC that it now sees no future in making chipsets for third parties such as Intel and AMD.</p>
<p>Speaking to Custom PC, VIA’s vice president of corporate marketing in Taiwan, Richard Brown, explained that: ‘One of the main reasons we originally moved into the x86 processor business was because we believed that ultimately the third party chipset market would disappear, and we would need to have the capability to provide a complete platform.’</p>
<p>‘That has indeed come to pass,’ said Brown. He also added that ‘Intel provides the vast majority of chipsets for its processors and, following its purchase of ATI, AMD is also moving very quickly in the same direction.’</p></blockquote>
<p>I know that right now, in my Chaintech motherboard, I have a VIA 4-n-1 chipset for audio, video, memory and USB2 controllers.  And I know that VIA has supplied drivers and hardware for pretty much the last three or so builds of machines that I&#8217;ve had around here in the last few years.  </p>
<p>Regardless&#8230; guess it&#8217;s a tough business to be in.  Can&#8217;t wait to see what else VIA pulls out next.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/604608/via-quits-motherboard-chipset-business.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.custompc.co.uk/news/604608/via-quits-motherboard-chipset-business.html?referer=');">Link to the original article&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.removethelabels.com/2008/08/11/via-quits-motherboard-chipset-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Vista SP1&#8230; it sucks a little bit less.</title>
		<link>http://www.removethelabels.com/2008/03/19/microsoft-vista-sp1-it-sucks-a-little-bit-less/</link>
		<comments>http://www.removethelabels.com/2008/03/19/microsoft-vista-sp1-it-sucks-a-little-bit-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe_flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe_photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd_6400]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti_virus_software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple_os_x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccleaner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gddr3_memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd_2600xt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illustrator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magicjack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory_usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft_vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new_features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not_impressed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os_x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pidgin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superior_software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows_xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.removethelabels.com/?p=15064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won&#8217;t be scientific, post up a bunch of numbers that mean a lot to a few esoteric people; nor even give you anything more than just one simple opinion&#8230; Microsoft Vista SP1 is not harmful, but it doesn&#8217;t make things any better. Well, maybe 0.1% better than the original install. It doesn&#8217;t really add [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be scientific, post up a bunch of numbers that mean a lot to a few esoteric people; nor even give you anything more than just one simple opinion&#8230; Microsoft Vista SP1 is not harmful, but it doesn&#8217;t make things any better.  Well, maybe <strike>0.1%</strike> better than the original install.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t really add any new features that I can immediately tell.  It doesn&#8217;t reduce the memory usage.  It doesn&#8217;t even make my Vista experience on an AMD 6400+ Black edition processor with SATAII drives, 2GB of Corsair memory and an ATi HD 2600XT with 512mb GDDR3 memory seem any faster.</p>
<p>In fact, it really didn&#8217;t make anything break, slower or worse.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s a good thing.  <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1205912603_0">Microsoft</span> didn&#8217;t break anything.  My anti-virus software still works.  As does my NetLimiter Pro firewall.  As does my MagicJack, Skype, Pidgin, <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1205912603_1">Adobe Photoshop</span>, Illustrator and Flash.  I still have to clean up crap with CCleaner occasionally, and above all it didn&#8217;t stop VLC from working&#8230; </p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t make anything seem faster, but it didn&#8217;t make anything seem slower.  So&#8230; job well done Microsoft.  You had the chance to make Vista seem better&#8230; and you didn&#8217;t capitalize.</p>
<p>If it makes you feel better, I feel like Leopard, before <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1205912603_2">Apple OS X</span> 10.5.2 that is, had slowed down on superior software.  Running <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1205912603_3">Windows XP</span> on this same machine is like moving at mach speed.  Running <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1205912603_4">OS X</span> 10.4.11 on the same hardware seems to make 10.5/10.5.1 seem slow as well.  At least 10.5.2 made things better, at least on the machines that I use.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to hoping that SP2 make Vista better; SP1 <strong>did not</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.removethelabels.com/2008/03/19/microsoft-vista-sp1-it-sucks-a-little-bit-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 8/44 queries in 0.200 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 736/852 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.removethelabels.com @ 2012-02-13 15:50:16 -->
