Verizon has announced on their blog that the telco is letting owners of select Android-based Verizon Wireless phones use the devices to control their FiOS TV service. According to big red, users of the Motorola Droid or HTC Imagio can download the new application that will mimic all the usual controls for Verizon’s HD set-top-box. Verizon says they’ll ultimately expand the lineup of phones that can be used as remotes, but they’re not specifying which ones just yet. It also only works for high definition set tops.

Reaction among users who’ve tried the service in our forums is positive so far, aside from complaints of a few initialization snags. Judging from comments, this works over Wi-Fi – not over 3G (just what users need, getting charged per megabyte for channel surfing). That of course lets you to use the service from anywhere in the house, allowing you to drive your loved ones crazy as an added bonus.

The application actually appears to do more than your remote ever did. The “My Photos” allows users to “flick” a single picture at your set top so it can be viewed on the TV screen. Users can also set the application up to mute or pause your program when the phone rings, then resume when your call ends.

As the phone companies try to differentiate themselves from cable, integrating smartphone functionality is an obvious next step. AT&T allows general U-Verse TV DVR control via smartphones, but it has long been rumored they’re working on a mobile place-shifting solution that ties your iPhone to U-Verse TV service. This is a particular niche that’s only just starting to take off, but will get truly interesting when users are able to watch home DVR content from anywhere via smartphone.

Link to the original article…

Over the last six months, many AT&T employees have told us they expect the telco to continue laying off a considerable number of workers in 2010. The cuts are underway in California, where local news outlet KCRA notes that AT&T is planning to lay off 525 technicians statewide by the end of March. The cuts of course are tied, in part, to AT&T continues landline losses; AT&T landline revenues last quarter fell 7.1% to $16.3 billion from $17.6 billion one year ago. In Connecticut, where the telco already has a tense relationship with CT Attorney General Richard Blumenthal over previous layoffs, the company says they’re trimming an additional 160 jobs by February 19.

Link to the original article…

While Verizon gets most of the attention with their $23 billion investment in fiber to the home deployment, a significant chunk of the fiber to the home deployments in this country is being accomplished by roughly 700 smaller rural telcos, co-ops, and municipal operations. According to a new study by the National Telecommunications Cooperative Association (NTCA), a growing number of rural telcos are moving toward fiber to the node (like AT&T’s U-Verse platform), while many others are moving directly to fiber to the home:

NTCA’s “2009 Broadband/Internet Availability Survey” found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of respondents with a fiber deployment strategy intend to offer FTTN to more than 75% of their customer base by 2011. Fifty-five percent plan to offer FTTH to more than half their customers in that same time frame – more than doubled from just 26% last year. The study says that rural areas are seeing significant gains in broadband speeds, primarily due to the increased fiber availability in their communities. Fifty-three percent of respondents indicated their customers can now receive broadband service of between 3 and 6 Mbps (up from 46% last year), and 39% can receive service in excess of 6 Mbps, which is an increase from just 25% a year ago.

According to the most recent data (pdf) from the Fiber To The Home Council, the total number of homes served by FTTH is now 4.4 million, or 4% of all homes. FTTH service now passes (no last mile drop) 15 million US homes, or 13% of all US Households.

The picture has nothing to do with the article.

Link to the original article…

According to Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg, the telco isn’t worried about the threat Hulu poses to their freshly created TV empire, because Hulu will probably be dead in a year or two from now. “This is in for the next eight to twelve months and in two years it won’t matter because the world will have moved on,” the CEO was recently quoted as saying. He might not be wrong — Hulu very well could be headed for also-ran status once Comcast acquires NBC Universal, and does its best to ensure that Hulu doesn’t rock the TV revenue boat or bump up against the cable industry’s TV Everywhere initiative. That said, “cable guys” tend to have a degree of hubris in thinking that Internet video will never really harm them, despite the fact that when/if Hulu dies, there will be a stream of competitors (including piracy) waiting in the wings.

Link to the original article…