<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>remove the labels - Gadgets and Life &#187; upstream</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.removethelabels.com/tag/upstream/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.removethelabels.com</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Graphics, VoIP, Video Games, Deals, Rumors, Rants, Reviews and such.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:31:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Cox Launches 50 Mbps In Connecticut &#8211; $99 for 50/5 (55 Mbps with Powerboost)</title>
		<link>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/08/14/cox-launches-50-mbps-in-connecticut-99-for-505-55-mbps-with-powerboost/</link>
		<comments>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/08/14/cox-launches-50-mbps-in-connecticut-99-for-505-55-mbps-with-powerboost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mb/s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadbandreports.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cox Cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dial-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOCSIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOCSIS 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast speeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerBoost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upstream]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.removethelabels.com/?p=28348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cox Launches 50 Mbps In Connecticut - $99 for 50/5 (55 Mbps with Powerboost)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.removethelabels.com/images/cox_communication.jpg"  alt="Cox Launches 50 Mbps In Connecticut - $99 for 50/5 (55 Mbps with Powerboost)"/></p>
<p>Cox Communications has announced that the company is now offering faster, DOCSIS 3.0 based service to businesses and residential customers in Connecticut. That of course includes the company&#8217;s fastest Ultimate Internet tier, which offers 50 Mbps downstream (55 Mbps when Powerboost kicks in) and 5 Mbps upstream for $99 a month. According to the <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cox-launches-505-internet-speeds-in-connecticut-with-docsis-30-100540104.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cox-launches-505-internet-speeds-in-connecticut-with-docsis-30-100540104.html?referer=');">Cox press release</a>, the tier comes with three unique IP addresses, 10 e-mail addresses, and 50 hours per month of remote dial access (that last one being something you&#8217;ll enjoy for less than a month, since Cox is killing off backup dial-up <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/109275" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/109275?referer=');">starting in September</a>).</p>
<p><a href=http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Cox-Launches-50-Mbps-In-Connecticut-109884 onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/Cox-Launches-50-Mbps-In-Connecticut-109884?referer=');">Link to the original article&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/08/14/cox-launches-50-mbps-in-connecticut-99-for-505-55-mbps-with-powerboost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T Tinkers with DSL Pricing, Drops Tiers to $15-$20 for New Customers</title>
		<link>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/08/02/att-tinkers-with-dsl-pricing-drops-tiers-to-15-20-for-new-customers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/08/02/att-tinkers-with-dsl-pricing-drops-tiers-to-15-20-for-new-customers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadbandreports.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lack of incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migrating customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new pricing for new customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.removethelabels.com/?p=28236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#038;T Tinkers with DSL Pricing, Drops Tiers to $15-$20 for New Customers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.removethelabels.com/images/att_plain.jpg" />
<p>Last week AT&#038;T <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/109512" target="_new" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/109512?referer=');">posted their second quarter earnings</a>, and while wireless connectivity was hot, the company noted they lost a whopping 347,000 traditional DSL customers on the quarter. Some of those customers upgraded to AT&#038;T U-Verse, but many of them were users in un-upgraded AT&#038;T markets who migrated to cable, either lured by faster broadband speeds or the cable triple play. To try and fight back in legacy areas, AT&#038;T&#8217;s again tinkering with their DSL pricing, their <a href="http://www.att.com/gen/general?pid=6431" target="_new" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.att.com/gen/general?pid=6431&amp;referer=');">website</a> indicating that they&#8217;ve brought back the $14.95 per month price point for their Basic (768/384 kbps), Express (1.5 Mbps/ 384 kbps) and Pro (3 Mbps/ 512 kbps) DSL tiers, which are all starting to look very long in the tooth, especially upstream. The company&#8217;s Elite (6 Mbps / 512 kbps) tier is now $19.95. All of these deals are for new customers, and the pricing is for twelve months before you need to negotiate a better deal. </p>
<p><a href=http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATT-Tinkers-With-DSL-Pricing-109686 onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATT-Tinkers-With-DSL-Pricing-109686?referer=');">Link to the original article&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/08/02/att-tinkers-with-dsl-pricing-drops-tiers-to-15-20-for-new-customers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T Fixes Upstream 3G Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/07/26/att-fixes-upstream-3g-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/07/26/att-fixes-upstream-3g-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcatel-Lucent equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[better hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadbandreports.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crippled speeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fix it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uplink problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upstream]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.removethelabels.com/?p=28140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#038;T Fixes Upstream 3G Problem - Promised fix to Alcatel Lucent 'software defect' arriving?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.removethelabels.com/images/att_plain.jpg" /></p>
<p>Earlier this month, AT&#038;T users in many markets suddenly found themselves with <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Users-Reporting-Crippled-Upstream-iPhone-Speeds-109219" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/Users-Reporting-Crippled-Upstream-iPhone-Speeds-109219?referer=');">crippled upstream speeds</a> with some users unable to even exceed 50 kbps. AT&#038;T quickly responded to the complaints, noting that they&#8217;d <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/109249" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/109249?referer=');">found a software defect</a> in Alcatel-Lucent equipment (which isn&#8217;t in all markets). While an AT&#038;T statement at the time claimed AT&#038;T was &#8220;providing normal 3G uplink speeds and consistent performance,&#8221; that wasn&#8217;t really the case; users spent most of this month dealing with these crippled speeds.</p>
<p>But <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/r0/download/1567124~250ecf08445f1d3030eb8494614a27b1/IMG_0010.PNG" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/r0/download/1567124_250ecf08445f1d3030eb8494614a27b1/IMG_0010.PNG?referer=');">based on a tests this morning</a> in the NY/NJ area, it looks like AT&#038;T&#8217;s finally deploying a software patch. No comment yet from AT&#038;T if they have a timeline for all impacted markets.</p>
<p><a href=http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATT-Fixes-Upstream-3G-Problem-109565 onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/ATT-Fixes-Upstream-3G-Problem-109565?referer=');">Link to the original article&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/07/26/att-fixes-upstream-3g-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Cable Poised To Dominate The Telcos? DOCSIS 3.0 Might Be the Difference</title>
		<link>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/03/04/is-cable-poised-to-dominate-the-telcos-docsis-3-0-might-be-the-difference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/03/04/is-cable-poised-to-dominate-the-telcos-docsis-3-0-might-be-the-difference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOCSIS 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faster speeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last mile connectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telcos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upstream]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.removethelabels.com/?p=26908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The argument about whether or not DOCSIS 3.0 should be inexpensive to quickly deploy to 75 million Americans and how it can level the playing field against telcos for the cable industry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Is-Cable-Poised-To-Dominate-The-Telcos-107173" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/Is-Cable-Poised-To-Dominate-The-Telcos-107173?referer=');"><img src="http://www.removethelabels.com/images/connection_speeds.jpg" width="550" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Bernie Arnason over at <a href="http://www.telecompetitor.com/is-a-cable-perfect-competitive-storm-forming/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.telecompetitor.com/is-a-cable-perfect-competitive-storm-forming/?referer=');">Telecompetitor</a> makes the argument that with DOCSIS 3.0 relatively inexpensive to quickly deploy (75 million Americans should have it <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/107109" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/107109?referer=');">by the end of the year</a>) and many telcos clinging to aging copper last mile connectivity, the cable industry should have it pretty good competitively over the next few years. Comcast added more broadband customers (608K) in the last two quarters than AT&#038;T, Verizon, and Qwest combined (401K), and cable&#8217;s triple play continues to gobble up fleeing copper landline customers. Cable also dominates more than 90% of the VoIP market.</p>
<p><span id="more-26908"></span></p>
<p>Cable&#8217;s traditional weak spot &#8211; upstream bandwidth, looks to get some help later this year as cable operators perfect upstream channel bonding. Comcast <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Comcast-Upstream-Tests-75100-Mbps-107101" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/Comcast-Upstream-Tests-75100-Mbps-107101?referer=');">recently noted</a> that they&#8217;re seeing 75 to 100 Mbps upstream in tests. While Verizon&#8217;s decision to spend $23 billion on FTTH to the home puts them in a decent position for now, there&#8217;s a huge swath of America served by telcos using aging copper infrastructure that many of these companies can&#8217;t afford to upgrade to fiber. DOCSIS 3.0 means telcos will up their game <strong>somehow</strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It all adds up to this perfect competitive storm analogy I referred to early on. This storm compels the telcos who haven&#8217;t already done so to respond, primarily with FTTH. Good customer service, local presence, and a solid DSL product are very admirable and noble. But these storm clouds may demand much more.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/106940" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/106940?referer=');">Can Qwest seriously compete</a> with DOCSIS 3.0 with no money for serious upgrades? Marketing that pretends last mile copper is FTTH can <a href="http://www.qwest.com/residential/internet/fiber-optics.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.qwest.com/residential/internet/fiber-optics.html?referer=');">only go so far</a>. When does AT&#038;T decide to <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/102340" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/102340?referer=');">stop waiting on VDSL bonding</a> and pony up the cash for the move to FTTH? 3-7 Mbps is the fastest speed offered by Verizon in roughly half of its broadband territories. Luckily for most carriers, they&#8217;ll be sheltered from the &#8220;perfect competitive storm&#8221; Arnason mentions by the simple fact that many of their markets don&#8217;t see decent competition. When you&#8217;re the only game in town (be it cable, telco, satellite or carrier pigeon), you get to charge whatever you&#8217;d like for last-generation service.</p>
<p><a href=http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Is-Cable-Poised-To-Dominate-The-Telcos-107173 onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/Is-Cable-Poised-To-Dominate-The-Telcos-107173?referer=');">Link to the original article&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.removethelabels.com/2010/03/04/is-cable-poised-to-dominate-the-telcos-docsis-3-0-might-be-the-difference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windstream Bumps Upstream DSL Speeds &#8211; Give them a nudge if you don&#8217;t see the improvement&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/11/17/windstream-bumps-upstream-dsl-speeds-give-them-a-nudge-if-you-dont-see-the-improvement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/11/17/windstream-bumps-upstream-dsl-speeds-give-them-a-nudge-if-you-dont-see-the-improvement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[broadbandreports.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSL is fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSL is slow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faster is better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kbps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mbps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades are great]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windstream Communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.removethelabels.com/?p=25205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windstream has confirmed that the company has raised the upstream speed of their DSL tiers. Windstream says they're responding to a request by users who found 386 kbps to be a little dated for 2009. Both the company's 3 Mbps and 6 Mbps tiers have seen the upstream side of the equation nudged from 384 kbps to 768 kbps at no additional price.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Windstream-Bumps-Upstream-DSL-Speeds-105520" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/Windstream-Bumps-Upstream-DSL-Speeds-105520?referer=');"><img src="http://i.dslr.net/urls/7/50707.gif" width="100" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Ask and ye shall receive. Windstream has confirmed that the company has raised the upstream speed of their DSL tiers. Windstream says they&#8217;re responding to a request by users who found 386 kbps to be a little dated for 2009. Both the company&#8217;s 3 Mbps and 6 Mbps tiers have seen the upstream side of the equation nudged from 384 kbps to 768 kbps at no additional price. </p>
<p>The upgrades apparently started in early November and will be ongoing through December &#8211; so if you haven&#8217;t seen them yet readers can apparently <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23229001-" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/forum/r23229001-?referer=');">nudge Windstream</a> to get the upgrade now.</p>
<p><a href=http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Windstream-Bumps-Upstream-DSL-Speeds-105520 onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dslreports.com/shownews/Windstream-Bumps-Upstream-DSL-Speeds-105520?referer=');">Link to the original article&#8230;</a></p>
<p>[ Related: <a href="http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/11/04/windstream-acquires-nuvox-communications-adds-an-additional-90000-customers-to-the-mix/">Windstream Acquires NuVox</a> ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/11/17/windstream-bumps-upstream-dsl-speeds-give-them-a-nudge-if-you-dont-see-the-improvement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/40 queries in 0.686 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 827/902 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.removethelabels.com @ 2012-02-13 20:33:17 -->
