<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>remove the labels - Gadgets and Life &#187; USB 3.0 cables</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.removethelabels.com/tag/usb-3-0-cables/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.removethelabels.com</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Graphics, VoIP, Video Games, Deals, Rumors, Rants, Reviews and such.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:31:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Measuring USB 3.0 against SATA, Firewire and USB 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/11/11/measuring-usb-3-0-against-sata-firewire-and-usb-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/11/11/measuring-usb-3-0-against-sata-firewire-and-usb-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backward compatible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eSATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewire 400]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewire 800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first USB 3 tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel SSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keeping pace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SATA 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweaktown.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB 3.0 cables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.removethelabels.com/?p=25071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With USB 3.0 coming out very soon, it is expected all that had preceded it (USB 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 for instance) will be destroyed by how fast it can access other USB 3.0 enabled devices.  Tweaktown puts an early chipset through its paces against Firewire 400, Firewire 800, eSATA, SATA and USB 2.0 of course with varying results.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.removethelabels.com/images/USB_3.png" alt="Tweaktown measures USB 3.0 speed against Firewire, USB 2 and SATA" /></p>
<p>With USB 3.0 coming out very soon, it is expected all that had preceded it (USB 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 for instance) will be destroyed by how fast it can access other USB 3.0 enabled devices.  Tweaktown [ <a href="http://www.tweaktown.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tweaktown.com?referer=');">site here</a> ] puts an early chipset through its paces against Firewire 400, Firewire 800, eSATA, SATA and USB 2.0 of course with varying results.</p>
<blockquote><p>In our first test using HD Tune Pro, we can see that USB 3.0 is plenty faster than USB 2.0 when using the Intel SSD. It’s not 10 times faster as the marketing data tells us, but it is six times faster and a good sign for a technology still in its early stages of deployment in the consumer space.</p></blockquote>
<p>Tweaktown shows a few graphs worth of information that show how you might want to hold off and buy a SATA 2.0 and USB 3.0 based motherboard for your next PC build.  Definitely worthy of a quick read [ <a href="http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/3004/early_look_at_usb_3_0_x25_m_ssd_performance_versus_usb_2_0_esata_and_more/index.html" target="_new" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tweaktown.com/articles/3004/early_look_at_usb_3_0_x25_m_ssd_performance_versus_usb_2_0_esata_and_more/index.html?referer=');">read more</a> ], and they found that SATA 2.0 is keeping pace and sometimes beat USB 3.0 &#8211; barely.</p>
<p>[ <a href="http://www.tweaktown.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tweaktown.com?referer=');">Tweaktown</a> ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.removethelabels.com/2009/11/11/measuring-usb-3-0-against-sata-firewire-and-usb-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/15 queries in 0.076 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 355/380 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.removethelabels.com @ 2012-02-14 05:27:18 -->
